Religious-affiliated businesses are not exempt from the Health
Care Reform laws requirement that health
insurance plans cover contraceptives. Both Michigan Democratic Rep. Bart Stupak
and House Speaker John Boehner
oppose this requirement. Speaker Boehner even went as far as to accuse the President of attacking
religious freedom. Both of these politicians
are clearly wrong. The law does not prohibit the free exercise of any religion
as required by the U.S. Constitution (there isn’t any biblical (Christian) admonition against the use of birth
control). Also, some Hindus, believe producing more children than can be supported is a
violation of the Ahimsa (nonviolent
rule of conduct). The church is not being required to
provide this insurance and the people are not
being forced to take the
contraception. This ruling is about public hospitals and universities that are
required to hire without discrimination and should be required to provide
insurance without discrimination. This is not
about religion unless these institutions only served Catholics. If they hire a single non Catholic, or admit a
single non Catholic, then they are public and subject to public standards.
Taxpayer money
shouldn’t go to any religious run healthcare facility that doesn’t provide
contraception which is part of the reason they receive government funding. The contraception
requirement is in fact Constitutional
(“Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion”)
The birth control requirement protects human life and prevents abortions. The lifetime risk of dying from an unsafe abortion in the developed world is 1 in 3,700 procedures. Numerous studies show that use of effective modern contraception reduces unintended pregnancies and abortions. The abortion rate in the United States dropped 8 percent between 2000 and 2008, while rising nearly 18 percent among the country's poorest women. Of the more than 1.2 million legal abortions reported in 2008, women whose family income fell below the national poverty level accounted for 42 percent of them. "…it's possible women have reduced access to contraception and have more unintended pregnancies," says Rachel Jones, senior research associate at New York City's Guttmacher Institute and lead author of the report published Monday in the journal Obstetrics & Gynecology.